This article is the opinion of Ag Optimus.
Intro
For most cattle feeders, corn isn’t just an ingredient in the ration — it’s the backbone of the entire feeding operation. Feed represents the largest share of the cost of gain, and corn, in particular, determines everything from breakevens to placement decisions to marketing windows. When corn rallies, it squeezes margins quickly; when it falls, it can open opportunities. Because of this, feeders pay close attention to the calendar and ask the same question every year: Should cattle feeders lock in next year’s corn costs after harvest?
There’s no universal answer, but there are patterns worth understanding. Post-harvest often brings heavy grain movement, softer cash prices, and weaker basis levels in many regions. But every year is different. Weather, storage capacity, export demand, geopolitics, and South American crop prospects can all override seasonal tendencies. The key is understanding the mechanics of the corn market — cash prices, futures prices, basis behavior, and seasonal tendencies — and building a strategy that fits your operation’s risk tolerance.
This guide walks through the logic behind post-harvest pricing, the risks of locking in too early, the pros of acting sooner, how basis plays into the decision, and why a structured hedging approach, supported by a licensed commodity broker, often provides the most balanced outcome for feeders.
Should Cattle Feeders Lock in Next Year’s Corn Costs After Harvest? Why Timing Matters
Corn pricing isn’t simply a procurement decision — it directly influences everything in the yard. When corn rises, breakevens jump, cattle bids adjust, and yard profitability shifts. When corn falls, feeders have more room to bid or hold cattle longer. Each $ 0.10-per-bushel increase in corn prices raises the feeding cost of gain by approximately $0.86 per cwt, underscoring the significant impact of corn prices on operational costs. Because feed costs often determine whether a turn of cattle ends positive or negative, many feeders look to “buy value” when the market gives it.
Post-harvest in the fall — when combines roll and grain pours into the system — has historically been the time when corn prices are softest. But soft does not mean safe, and low does not mean the lowest. Markets are forward-looking and can behave in ways that don’t match expectations. Still, understanding what normally happens after harvest helps feeders make better decisions.
Post-Harvest: What Typically Happens to Corn Prices
When harvest is underway, corn flows quickly. Elevators fill, farmers sell to meet cash flow needs, and processors often have more grain than they need. This seasonal flush often puts pressure on both cash prices and basis levels. In many areas, the basis weakens in October and November, then strengthens as winter sets in and fewer farmers’ market grains are available. The expected trend is for corn prices to soften post-harvest before potentially firming up later in the season.
Futures markets also tend to soften during harvest, especially in large crop years. The new supply removes some uncertainty, and if the weather cooperates, futures can trend lower into the early winter months. But futures markets also react to global factors: demand from Mexico and Asia, ethanol plants’ usage rates, South American planting and weather patterns, and managed money fund positioning.
The combination of heavy supply and seasonal tendencies is why many feeders historically price a portion of next year’s corn during or shortly after harvest. Feeders often consult market reports and official data to inform their strategies. It gives them stability, cost clarity, and a chance to lock in feed at levels that often represent seasonal value. Locking in corn costs can mitigate the risk of future price spikes and allow for more accurate budgeting. Yet history doesn’t guarantee results, and the decision to price early comes with trade-offs.
Why Some Feeders Lock In Corn Costs After Harvest
One reason feeders favor post-harvest pricing is simple: clarity on the cost of gain. When feed is the largest expense in the yard, knowing your cost structure early—including your estimated feed cost—can help you bid more confidently for feeder cattle and plan your marketing windows. Feed cost is a key component of overall expenses, so understanding and projecting it is crucial for profitability. But corn pricing after harvest offers more than just clarity — it often offers opportunity.
With the system full of fresh grain, the basis tends to weaken. In some regions, basis can be wide enough to offer real value — a chance for feeders to secure corn or basis contracts at levels that don’t appear again until the next harvest. When the basis is weak, feeders may feel they’re capturing a favorable local market condition, even if futures remain uncertain.
Another advantage is protection from the unexpected. While many years bring steady or falling prices through winter, some years surprise everyone. Weather scares, global crop issues, or big export announcements can send corn sharply higher in late winter or spring. Feeders who priced early avoid the stress and uncertainty of chasing higher prices during the growing season.
Finally, early pricing can help with planning. Bankers often want to see risk-management strategies in place, and feeders who can show stabilized feed costs may have smoother financing conversations.
But despite these advantages, locking in corn early isn’t always the best choice.
Risks of Locking In Too Early
Corn doesn’t always rally after harvest. In some years, markets grind lower through winter as farmers delay sales, exports disappoint, or South America produces record crops. A decline in corn prices can occur, and feeders who lock in early may feel stuck if the market falls significantly later.
Basis can also behave unpredictably. While many regions see weak basis during harvest, others see their best basis of the year later, when farmers close bin doors, ethanol margins improve, or transportation bottlenecks ease. Missing out on a stronger basis means missing out on better pricing.
Another risk is market uncertainty. Locking in early removes one side of the equation — the upside risk — but also removes flexibility. Some feeders prefer to let the market develop, particularly in years with large global supplies or bearish fundamental signals, hoping for lower feed costs or a narrower basis.
Corn markets have a way of reminding everyone that the “obvious trade” often isn’t obvious at all.
Understanding Basis: The Feeder’s Advantage (or Risk)
For cattle feeders, basis may matter as much as, or even more than, futures prices. Basis tells feeders what the local market is willing to pay relative to the national benchmark. A weak basis (cheap cash corn) is often a feeder’s friend. A strong basis may signal tight supply, strong local competition, or logistical challenges. A wide basis after harvest suggests that storage is being “paid for” by the market, providing an incentive for feeders to consider holding grain to take advantage of better pricing opportunities.
When the basis is weak after harvest, some feeders try to secure it while it’s available — especially if their region tends to strengthen the basis through winter. When the basis is strong, feeders may prefer to hedge using futures or options, waiting for the basis to settle.
A wide basis also creates opportunities for basis contracts or structured hedging programs tailored to local conditions. Feeders with knowledgeable brokers often track 5–10 years of basis data to understand typical behavior, such as the average basis level over that period, and to measure basis risk or performance to avoid unnecessary risk.
How Feeders Hedge Corn Without Losing Flexibility
Feeders don’t need to choose between “locking it all in now” or “doing nothing.” The most effective operations use a variety of tools and financial services, often in combination, to manage corn prices over time.
Futures contracts give transparency and liquidity. Corn Options offer protection without obligation. Basis contracts allow feeders to capitalize on local price conditions. And layering — arguably the most practical approach — lets feeders spread out their risk over time instead of relying on perfect timing.
A layered strategy might look like this: securing a portion of corn after harvest, another during winter dips, and a final portion during spring volatility, all while considering projected corn prices or costs in the decision-making process. This balanced method helps feeders capture market opportunities while avoiding the regret that comes from betting everything on a single moment.
No tool guarantees success, but using several tools and services helps feeders manage uncertainty more effectively.
When Waiting Makes More Sense
There are years when waiting to price corn is more reasonable. If the basis is unusually strong at harvest, it may weaken later. If global supplies are large, futures may drift lower. If storage capacity is abundant, the market may soften through winter. If ethanol demand is slow or exports are weak, the market may struggle to rally. In these cases, feeders may decide that post-harvest pricing is not compelling enough to justify action.
Good risk management is not just about acting early — it’s about acting when the market gives you a reason. Market indicators or experts may suggest waiting for clearer signals before making pricing decisions.
Why Working With a Licensed Commodity Broker Helps
Corn and cattle markets are deeply interconnected. Feeders who manage one without understanding the other can expose themselves to unnecessary risk. A licensed commodity broker who understands cattle feeding economics, basis patterns, seasonal tendencies, and hedging tools can help feeders make more informed decisions, with a particular focus on key market factors that impact profitability.
A broker cannot predict the market — but they can help feeders understand it, evaluate risk, track historical tendencies, monitor local basis conditions, and structure hedges that fit the operation’s feeding cycle and risk tolerance.
In a volatile environment, having a second set of trained eyes watching the markets can make a significant difference.
You don’t need Wall Street advice — you need a broker who knows cattle, corn, and country logic.
Our broker MATT says cattle and marriage are the same — sometimes you just step back, take a deep breath, and let ’em settle… because chasing them only makes things worse.
Call Ag Optimus and let’s get to work. Call an Ag Optimus licensed commodity broker for guidance tailored to your cattle or grain operation.
Toll Free: (800) 944-3850 • Local: (712) 545-0182 • agoptimus.com
Conclusion: Should Feeders Lock In Corn After Harvest?
There’s no one-size-fits-all answer. Some years, post-harvest offers the best pricing of the season. Other years, the market continues lower — it can be a different story entirely, with outcomes that defy expectations. The choice depends on futures structure, basis behavior, storage capacity, cash flow, risk tolerance, and local conditions. The cattle production cycle, which lasts about 10 years but can range from 8 to 12 years depending on factors such as drought, also shapes market dynamics and pricing decisions.
Post-harvest pricing can offer stability, clarity, and value — but not certainty. Waiting can offer opportunity — but also risk. The most effective feeders combine market awareness, structured hedging tools, and disciplined timing to avoid big mistakes and capture reasonable opportunities.
And for many feeders, the best approach isn’t picking the “right” moment — it’s spreading decisions across time, using futures, options, basis contracts, and professional support to manage risk without relying on perfect timing.